<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Weapons Are Not Swung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mu.ranter.net/design-theory/weapons/big-weapons-are-not-swung/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mu.ranter.net</link>
	<description>I miss my frames.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:46:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Incanur</title>
		<link>http://mu.ranter.net/design-theory/weapons/big-weapons-are-not-swung/comment-page-1#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Incanur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mu.ranter.net/design-theory/weapons/big-weapons-are-not-swung#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Halberds most certainly were swung with the intent of cleaving skulls. This comes out abundantly in period military texts, martial arts manuals, and artwork. The same goes for two-handed swords. Your overall point about reach stands, but a properly timed stroke works wondrous effects in combat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halberds most certainly were swung with the intent of cleaving skulls. This comes out abundantly in period military texts, martial arts manuals, and artwork. The same goes for two-handed swords. Your overall point about reach stands, but a properly timed stroke works wondrous effects in combat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

